https://dspace.qou.edu/handle/194/2753 Tue, 19 May 2026 01:46:42 GMT 2026-05-19T01:46:42Z https://dspace.qou.edu/handle/194/3080 Facilitation and evangelism in calling to God in light of the Qur’an and Sunnah The current study aims to shed light on facilitation and evangelism in calling to God in light of the Qur'an and Sunnah. It also aims to demonstrate the importance of facilitation as an objective of Islamic law. It also aims to demonstrate the tolerance of Islam and its facilitation of worshippers, including mitigation and easing when there are inconsequential hardships. It also aims to demonstrate the comprehensiveness of facilitation in all aspects and branches of Islamic law. It also aims to demonstrate the importance of facilitation in resolving problems facing those obligated to do so. It also aims to condemn extremism and fanaticism in Islamic law, and to demonstrate the danger of excessive strictness, especially in acts of worship, and how it leads to the alienation of those obligated to do so and their cessation of worship. The importance of the current study stems from understanding the objectives of Islamic law, as facilitation is a vital matter that requires in-depth study, especially in light of the difficult circumstances facing the Islamic nation. Removing hardship from worshippers and facilitating them are essential features of Islamic law and are considered an important objective of its objectives. Hence, the importance of this study in shedding light on this. This study represents great importance for a new generation of preachers who adopt a moderate approach. The problem with this study lies in the study differentiates between Islam's call for facilitation, moderation, tolerance, and balance, and its rejection of extremism and fanaticism, and between laxity, laxity, negligence, and neglect. The study seeks to answer the following questions: How can we disseminate the culture of moderation, facilitation, and evangelism among the new generation of preachers? What is the best way to combat extremism and radicalism and limit its spread among the nation's youth? To study the topic and arrive at the desired results, the descriptive analytical approach was used, as well as the inductive and deductive approaches, as is the case in most research in Islamic and human studies. The study came in three chapters with several topics for each. The first chapter dealt with the concept, legitimacy, importance and controls of facilitation and evangelism. The second chapter dealt with the areas of facilitation and evangelism in the Islamic approach. The third chapter discussed facilitation and evangelism in calling to God. The conclusion included the results and recommendations. The most important results that were reached were the following: 1- The legitimacy of facilitation and evangelism stems from the Qur’an and Sunnah, and Muslim scholars throughout the ages have given it great importance and devoted a large space to it in the books of the principles of Sharia. 2- Facilitation and evangelism include all aspects of Sharia, including beliefs, worship, transactions and customs. There is no aspect of Sharia that is not covered by facilitation and evangelism. Based on the findings, the study recommends the following: 1. Disseminate the jurisprudence of facilitation and evangelism widely, include it in religious curricula in schools, and expand it to universities as an independent course in Sharia colleges. 2. Hold courses for preachers that address the jurisprudence of facilitation and evangelism and its importance in spreading Islam, especially among new preachers, and explain its role in attracting converts. 3. Increase sermons and preaching lessons in mosques that demonstrate the tolerance and ease of religion, and make facilitation and evangelism a widespread culture among members of the Muslim community. Wed, 01 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT https://dspace.qou.edu/handle/194/3080 2026-04-01T00:00:00Z https://dspace.qou.edu/handle/194/3079 القواعدُ والضَّوابطُ الفقهيَّةُ النَّاظمةُ للعلاقاتِ الدَّوليَّةِ في الإسلام Juridical and Legal Principles Regulating International Relations in Islam This study aims to uncover the comprehensive methodological framework established by Islamic jurisprudence to regulate the relations of the Islamic state with other nations and peoples. It demonstrates that Islam has not left any area of international relations without setting foundational principles and general rules to govern it, based on the objectives of Sharia in achieving benefits and preventing harm, while preserving religious constants. The study presents a systematic vision that corrects the distorted perception which views international relations in Islam as a constant state of conflict. Instead, it clarifies that Islam organizes these relations through jurisprudential rules and principles derived from sound intellectual and legal foundations, explaining, analyzing, and demonstrating their applications. The problem of the study lies in the existence of a gap between the stereotypical image of international relations in Islam and their true essence. Therefore, the study relied on the inductive analytical method to establish solid jurisprudential rules and consistent regulations, by presenting and analyzing the relevant Qur’anic and Prophetic texts and comparing the views of scholars in light of contemporary reality. It also employed the descriptive method through a review of historical and contemporary applications, using examples from the Prophet’s biography and Islamic history. The study consists of an introduction, three chapters, and a conclusion. The introduction covers the research problem, objectives, importance, previous studies, methodology, and plan. Chapter One discusses the concept of international relations in Islam, their development, foundations, characteristics, and objectives. It shows that such relations date back to the time of the Prophet ﷺ and his noble Companions and continued to develop afterward. Chapter Two examines the jurisprudential rules governing international relations in Islam and their applications. Through an inductive reading, it confirms that Islamic Sharia has established the foundations for organizing international relations, similar to what international law seeks to achieve. Chapter Three deals with the jurisprudential controls regulating these relations and demonstrates the flexibility of Islamic jurisprudence in handling them, thanks to its reliance on universal Sharia objectives such as justice, fulfillment of covenants, human dignity, and ijtihad (independent reasoning). The conclusion presents the key findings and recommendations, followed by indexes of Qur’anic verses, Hadiths, sources, and references. Sat, 04 Apr 2026 00:00:00 GMT https://dspace.qou.edu/handle/194/3079 2026-04-04T00:00:00Z https://dspace.qou.edu/handle/194/3065 The Legal Objectives (Maqasid al-Sharia) According to Imam al-Shatibi and Their Application in Calling to Allah Almighty Ahmed Abu al-Sebaa, Saher; Mohamed Shendi, Prof. Ismail This study aimed to identify the objectives of Islamic law (maqāṣid al-sharīʿah) according to Imam al-Shāṭibī and to examine their application in the call to Allah Almighty. The study derives its importance from the contemporary need of daʿwah discourse for a sound Sharīʿah-based methodology that takes into account the objectives of Islamic law and the interests of people, and that balances between textual evidence and public interest in calling to Allah Almighty. To achieve this aim, the study adopted the descriptive-analytical method and the inductive method. The researcher divided the study into four chapters: the first addresses Imam al-Shāṭibī and his efforts in serving the sources of daʿwah; the second is devoted to explaining the theory of maqāṣid and its development; the third examines the characteristics of daʿwah to Allah and the qualities of a successful dāʿiyah according to Imam al-Shāṭibī; and the fourth discusses Imam al-Shāṭibī’s methodology in daʿwah to Allah, comprising three sections. At the end of the study, a number of findings were reached, the most important of which are: that, according to al-Shāṭibī, the objectives of Islamic law constitute a fundamental tool for understanding Sharīʿah rulings and keeping pace with positive change in society, which motivates the dāʿiyah to present the message of Islam in a manner that reflects the true nature of this religion and its tolerance; that Imam al-Shāṭibī’s approach to daʿwah is based on adherence to the Qur’an and the Sunnah and moderation in dealing with Islamic jurisprudence, emphasizing the importance of balancing facilitation and strictness and rejecting blind imitation; and that Imam al-Shāṭibī held a balanced, Sharīʿah-grounded vision in assessing the role of reason and its relationship to revelation, clarifying that reason must be subordinate to transmitted texts and should not تجاوز the limits set by the Sharīʿah.. Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 GMT https://dspace.qou.edu/handle/194/3065 2025-11-04T00:00:00Z https://dspace.qou.edu/handle/194/3030 - This study, entitled "Palestinian Prisoners in Israeli Occupation Prisons Between the Principles of Islamic Sharia and International Law: Al-Aqsa Flood as a Model," aims to shed light on the rulings governing the treatment of prisoners in both Islamic Sharia and international law. It does so by analyzing the points of convergence and divergence between the two systems in this regard and by clarifying the foundations and principles that govern the treatment of prisoners within each framework. The study also seeks to highlight the violations faced by Palestinian prisoners in Israeli occupation prisons and to assess the extent of Israel’s compliance with international treaties related to prisoners of war. Furthermore, the study addresses the implications of Al-Aqsa Flood operation on prisoners in Israeli custody, evaluating the role of local and international institutions in monitoring their conditions. It also proposes legal and Sharia-based mechanisms to confront Israeli violations and ensure effective protection for prisoners. To analyze and discuss these objectives, the researcher employed the comparative descriptive method. The core problem addressed in this study revolves around the extent to which the principles of international humanitarian law align with or contradict the rulings of Islamic Sharia regarding the treatment of prisoners, and how these principles are reflected in the situation of Palestinian prisoners within the context of Al-Aqsa Flood events. The study is structured into an introduction, four main chapters, and a conclusion. Chapter One discusses the concept of prisoners in both Islamic Sharia and international law. Chapter Two examines the conditions of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli occupation prisons. Chapter Three explores the impact of Al-Aqsa Flood operation on these prisoners. Chapter Four addresses the mechanisms for protecting Palestinian prisoners under both international law and Islamic Sharia. The study concluded with several key findings and recommendations, most notably: both Islamic Sharia and international law affirm the humane treatment of prisoners of war; however, Sharia is distinguished by fundamental differences in its legal foundations and the diversity of options it offers in dealing with prisoners, granting it greater flexibility in achieving the objectives of justice and mercy. Additionally, Israel’s policies toward Palestinian prisoners—before, during, and after captivity—reflect a racist and repressive nature, violating international agreements that guarantee protection for prisoners of war. Al-Aqsa Flood operation, in turn, emerged as a natural response to the ongoing injustices faced by the Palestinian people, particularly prisoners. Therefore, comprehensive support for Palestinian prisoners is imperative, encompassing all aspects of their lives and ensuring a dignified existence. Tue, 04 Nov 2025 00:00:00 GMT https://dspace.qou.edu/handle/194/3030 2025-11-04T00:00:00Z